Microsoft .NET Training Courses - Canada

The trainer focused on each persons requirements for the course and tuned the material to suit our goals.

Interaction with the teacher, the opportunity to ask hot questions

Examples used during glazing.

Communicator's communicativeness, many examples from the professional life leading to the sense of usefulness of the presented PowerShell issues

It was a compact and well delivered one.

I appreciated Folio's wide breadth of knowledge. Not only was he familiar with the course content, but he also knew of constructs in languages we were familiar with to make examples more meaningful to us. During intervals he shared his knowledge of technologies and solutions outside the training scope to provide insights into other solutions we could use in future (and future training).

I generally was benefit from the hands-on training.

I generally liked the serialization in one line.

I liked the advanced subjects about object orientation.

I really liked the good pacing, good analysis.

All the knowledge acquired through the training sessions.

I really enjoyed the practical exercises.

I genuinely enjoyed the workshop approach Tasks.

I mostly was benefit from the trainer knowledge :).

I generally enjoyed the many useful and practical examples.

I mostly liked the trainer knowledge and approach.

leading

Brian was great.

The atmosphere was easy going and Brian helped us understand with real life examples making it more comprehensive and tangible.

I generally was benefit from the exercise during training.

that the trainer is a practitioner

That it was very practical.

trainer's knowledge and experience

A practical approach to the topic. Trainer knowledge.

it was at a comfortable pace, so you didn't get left behind

Good explanations during the teaching sessions.

venue was nice, people running the venue were nice. the trainer was a genuine good guy.

Exercises

The Practical side of the course - the whole point of an instructor is to have someone to call on when difficulties are encountered. Definitions of Scrum and Product Owners etc. can be studied without the need for an instructor. But using Visual Studio, getting Specflow up and running and using it right - these are the elements of training that require an instructor. These practical hand-on exercises are the elements I liked the most. I would have liked more of this.

I enjoyed the feature file and corresponding steps creation.

The trainer had excellent knowledge of his subject. Very approachable.

I like the combination of dry goods and practice.

The ambiance. It was a nice training.

I like learning of the features of UIPath

knowledge, contact

Teacher Yuan Bin is very specific.

open any SW which I have in my computer to find data and operate with the data

I like the SAP RPA practice section.

I like to practice and answer questions.

There is also a combination of calling SAP and introducing the functionality of SAP's own script.

Each module will add hands-on links and the final Q&A session.

I like to do exercises.

I like the teacher to tell the case.

Recap of programming concepts and exercises (but not everyone did enjoy it cause they are not familiar with basics of programming).

The pacing is just right and Swarna covered almost everything about UIPath.

Approach to trainees-a lot of practical tasks especially from the scope of our own process work

We have Transformed a lot of practical tasks, which is a big plus. We also Automated your processes, so you could immediately see how UIPath can help you in our daily work. The host has a lot of knowledge, very approable to convey it.

Subject And level adapted to the participants. The Trainer and the participants identify the processes that can be automated and then enter SOUTH Africa into the process. High-level trainer Qualification

Hands on and really practical

Hands on and very practical.

The right balance between theory and practice. Good knowledge of trainers.

A Practical approach

Good balance between theory and practice

Examples

Extensive and complete knowledge of the instructor.

Examples of specific systems, providing information about the GO language

Introduction to the use of the software and instructions for the operation of various cases

Exercises

Practice and feedback

There are rewards for answering questions~

I liked how the examples lead to the next. You are able to use what you learnt in the previous segment in the next.

I liked when it ended. I liked the free lunch my company provided

Manpreet(Trainer ) was well prepared and he knows what is doing and teaching.

All of the topic are interested.

trainers knowledge was excellent

Very knowledgeable trainer

It took up good stuff with a good speed, and not stayed in areas that was not important, left that to the student when the course was over. I mean that for a 2 day course its a good value.

It covered the subjects i had hoped based upon the training outline. I liked how Collin build the "programs" while explaining it to see how it works. This makes you encounter some basic mistakes like typing errors, forgetting to declare a variable and such so you know what to look for when programming on your own.

She’s friendly nd so nice and kindly also she help me to understand

It was interactive, I could ask many questions and the instructor would modify his lecture to answer my questions

Learning about C# and it's capabilities.

he was enthusiastic, and did try to liven people up.

I feel my expectations were completly missed with training agenda. Training was way to complex as for ‚Introduction’ in my opinion. But i don’t think it is trainer who agreed scope of training, rather our side we set agenda

zaangażowanie i wiedza trenera, praktyczne przykłady i porównanie produktów z rynku,

I appreciate the way training was handled, that different training topics were covered when going through an example. Trainer is well experienced and knowledgeable with the subject.

getting programming knowledge refreshed

getting programming knowledge refreshed

I like to do exercises.